Risk Factors for Infection of Sutured Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Injuries.

Background: Maxillofacial soft tissue injuries (STIs) are common and frequent in emergency departments. The aim of this study was to analyze factors causing infection of maxillofacial STIs. Patients and Methods: Patients with maxillofacial STIs who received sutures and had complete medical records were evaluated. Gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, diabetes mellitus, wound age, wound length, wound contamination, wound type, and sites were analyzed using univariable analysis and binary logistic regression. Results: There were 3,276 cases included. In the univariable analysis, there was no significant difference in the infection rate between genders or between the wound age groups. In binary logistic regression, age, wound length, wound type, and physician level were risk factors for infection: age of 18-44 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-2.9), 44-64 years (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.3-4.3), and ≥65 years (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.1); wound length of 4-8 cm (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2) and >8 cm (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.1); intra-oral wounds (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4) and communicating wounds (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.3-4.4); junior specialists (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2); and lip (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.1-12.0) and cheek (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.3-17.1) sites. Wound contamination, ASA grade, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly different from wound infection in binary regression analysis. Conclusions: Age (>18 years old), wound length (>4 cm), intra-oral wounds, communicating wounds, suturing by junior surgeons, and lip or cheek injuries may be risk factors for maxillofacial STI infection. Even if the penetrating wound age exceeds 24 hours, it is meaningful to suture if there is no serious infection. For wounds at high risk of infection, further measures should be considered to reduce the possibility of infection, such as improving the surgical training of junior surgeons and improving the patient's wound care.

A Retrospective Study of Oral Emergency Services During COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to examine changes in the number of patient visits and types of oral services in an oral emergency department from the beginning to the control stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Beijing. METHODS: The numbers of daily oral emergency visits from January 20 to March 24, 2020, at a dental university hospital in Beijing and daily newly confirmed COVID-19 cases in Beijing during the same period were collected and analysed. All oral emergency patient information (including sex, age, and oral diagnosis) was also collected and analysed. Patients with incomplete medical data were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 12,416 patients were included in this study. The number of daily emergency visits was negatively correlated with the number of newly confirmed local COVID-19 cases in Beijing (P < .001). The number of daily emergency visits during the COVID-19 stable period in Beijing was greater than that during the outbreak period (P < .001). Compared to those in the COVID-19 outbreak period, the percentages of females, children and adolescents, patients with acute toothache, and patients with nonurgent cases were higher in the stable period, and the numbers of patients with toothache, trauma, infection, and nonemergency conditions increased in the COVID-19 stable period (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 significantly influenced the number of patient visits and the percentages of patients with oral emergency situations in the oral emergency department. There were obvious differences in treatment seeking for oral emergencies between the COVID-19 periods in Beijing. There was an inverse relationship between daily oral emergency visits and daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in Beijing.